Keyword: education policy

ABSTRACT: Over the last two decades, education systems have become increasingly digital. This digitalization goes beyond classroom teaching processes; it also raises a governance issue concerning where educational data is collected, who provides the digital infrastructure, and at what level decision-making authority is exercised. Based on the OECD's report comparing 29 education jurisdictions, our study classifies these jurisdictions along four dimensions: the level of centralization of decision-making authority, public control over educational data, whether the digital infrastructure is provided by the public sector or through private platforms, and the binding nature of data protection rules. In our study, we transformed these four dimensions into a digital sovereignty score and evaluated the jurisdictions under four governance typologies. Our findings reveal that digital governance in education is not geographically uniform. In systems with a strong tradition of centralized governance, public control over data and infrastructure is more pronounced, while in systems with high levels of school autonomy, dependence on private providers increases. This study examines this dependence within the framework of data colonialism, arguing that the transfer of educational data to private platforms creates a new problem of digital sovereignty.

ABSTRACT: In emerging research systems, doctoral publication requirements often outpace the support available to early-career researchers. This study examines whether funded project participation is associated with publication productivity among doctoral students and doctoral graduates in Kazakhstan, and whether particular support forms are more closely linked to international and domestic outputs. The analysis uses an anonymous 2025 survey of 808 respondents from six scientific fields and estimates negative binomial models for Scopus/Web of Science and domestic recommended-journal publication counts. Respondents with any project support reported higher raw mean Scopus/WoS output than unsupported respondents (2.05 vs. 1.11 publications). In adjusted models, any project support was associated with 58% higher expected Scopus/WoS publication counts (IRR = 1.58, 95% CI [1.35, 1.86], p < .001), while the association with domestic publications was marginal (IRR = 1.13, p = .057). Salary support and equipment/software support were significant predictors of Scopus/WoS output; field variation was descriptive rather than statistically significant. The findings suggest that project participation matters most when it supplies time, financial stability, and research infrastructure, not merely formal inclusion in funded grants.